2006.11.15

What makes an expert?

In the latest episode of Managing the Gray, C.C. Chapman talked about “being an expert”. This is something that comes up often on marketing and public relations Podcasts, and at Podcast conferences. It took listening to C.C. talk about this – again – to inspire me to share my thoughts.

Most of us are uncomfortable with the idea of being perceived as experts. In a traditional sense, an expert has engaged in years of research and has likely been published and scrutinized (in an academic sense).

Social networks and new media, such as blogs and Podcasts, have resulted in a new surge of perceived experts. This is because of two things:

  • consumer power to make choice is greater now than it has ever been
  • people are able to translate their passion into a communicable form for mass consumption

Rightly or wrongly, the term “expert” is no longer exclusive; it’s now used to describe those who can magnetize an audience. Experts are now designated by niche communities based on an ability to communicate opinions, ideas, experiences and passion. You can do any amount of research, or none at all, and still be seen as an expert. Experts can independently publish, in any form, and will be scrutinized (in the online sense). Digital technologies have caused a revolution on expertise, making it as much about what you feel as what you know.

This shift has caused many radio stations, indeed many media organizations, to feel threatened by social media – they are not designed to enjoy the same connection with their audience. It is also one of the many reasons why companies see, or should see, significant value in embracing social media technologies.

If you blog or Podcast, particularly on a niche topic, you’re likely seen as an expert.

Pass it on:
Tags:
Filed Under:
  • http://www.amuk.ca daryl cognito

    In my own head, I consider myself an expert. With almost 20 years experience in non profit, I believe that I understand clearly how and why non profits can and should use podcasting and blogging. I also (privately) believe that I have the skills in both of these areas to do it well. Now, I don’t bill myself publicly as an expert, why, because I still believe that the term expert carries a lot of weight. When I hear someone use it (two come to mind, one Canadian and one mentioned in your post) I become skeptical. I remember coming across a book “The business podcasting bible” I think, at the expo. I mentioned it to a friend who responded with “isn’t it too early for there to be a bible?” I think that the medium of podcasting is still young, and while there of definitely some people doing some great stuff, there term expert should not be thrown around lightly. In fact, with what I have read and heard by so-called experts, I would be inclined to stay away from anyone using the term.

  • http://people.auc.ca/brodbeck/blog Dave Brodbeck

    I feel funny when I get called an expert in what I am actually an expert in.. Seriously. Perhaps that is the Canadian in me.

    I have heard statements about podcasting from self proclaimed experts, and I will not name them, that are clearly complete BS.

    Dave

  • http://www.mostlynews.net Charles Cadenhead

    Daryl, you are an expert and so are you Mark.

  • Tom

    Here is the real definiton of an expert. You have to have either 10yrs or 10,000 hrs of experience your field of study or service you do.

    1. You need the academic background BS, MS, or PhD
    2. You need to have spent time in the field and hours training as aforementioned.
    3. You need to be able to show application of your expertise (doctor, lawyer, trainer, construction worker, military officer, etc…

© 2005 - 2012 Mark Blevis. Design by SnowyDay