2009.11.04

Audio Secret Sauce

One of my clients called me last week to follow up on some audio production work I had done for them. It was the recording engineer who called on this occasion. It seems he produced a piece of audio recently that his manager compared to work I had done then suggested he find out my audio secret sauce in making their productions sound warm and full.

Based on the conversation, I came up with three ingredients to my audio secret sauce.

1) GOOD EQUIPMENT

Not everyone has the budget of my client and can stock up on good quality microphones (I believe my client uses Hiel mics), preamps, mixing boards and recording hardware. Get the best equipment your budget can afford.

I highly recommend establishing a good relationship with a local store and make arrangements to try their equipment out, renting or borrowing equipment is that’s an option or having a decent amount of time to try it out in the store. Before making my decision to buy an Electrovoice RE-20 microphone a few years ago, my contact at a local store sent me home with five expensive microphones (almost $3500 worth) to try in my home studio and on my recording equipment.

It’s not only the microphone that makes a difference. You also need to consider the cabling ($10 dollar, 25 foot cables give $10, 25 foot sound) and the sound board and/or sound card you’re plugging your microphone into. Everything in the input chain affects the quality of the input signal you’re recording.

The same goes for your portable recording setup. Buy the portable audio recorder that offers you the best quality for your budget, not the one that you think looks cool. If you have the money, invest in a decent handheld microphone (and cable) to use with your portable recorder.

2) ‘LESS IS MORE’

This rule applies throughout the recording, editing and mixing stages of audio production and is a lesson I learned many years ago from Mark Blacher, owner of the long lost DB Recording Systems.

To start, you want to do as little input-processing as possible. In the case of my client, I know the engineer only does a little bit of equalizing to account for the room in which they record. Aside from that, I recommend doing nothing more than a little bit of limiting to prevent clipping. Limiting is done using an effects processor called (appropriately enough) a limiter to prevent music or the person speaking from being so loud that it negatively affects the recording.

My client’s engineer does a fantastic job with the recording and I’ve told him as much, encouraging him to not change anything (more on this later). His recordings are clean and warm. That’s easy to work with in post production. As Mark Blacher used to say (and probably still does), “you can’t make a bad recording sound good, you can only make it sound less bad.”

Signal processing is where people tend to make the biggest mistakes. Whether its equalizers, compressors/limiters, noise filter and gates, reverbs, delays or maximizers, the trend is to add elements without listening to how each adjustment affects the whole. The goal of using effects is generally to make all of the pieces fit together in the final mix. Of course, this is different if the goal is to be wild, crazy or a little more artistic/avante-garde.

In the spoken word and corporate audio production work I do, I use only the effects that actually add something meaningful to the mix. Then, another lesson from Mark Blacher, I add as much as it takes to audibly notice the effect over the mix, then back it off so it’s part of the mix.

To help with the understanding, let’s explore a few scenarios.

VOICEOVER WITH MUSIC: Here, we want the voice to stand out over the music and have both be elements of the mix without competing for attention. A rookie mistake is to focus strictly on bringing the music down in the mix (or worse, bring the voice up) so the voiceover stands out. The danger here is that the music gets pulled back too much and the mix loses a lot of the energy it needs from the relationship of the music and voice, together. I try to use both levels and equalization to pull the music back enough. With a little experimentation, I use the equalizer to find the dominant frequencies shared by both music and voice (voice being the primary user of those frequencies) and then pull those frequencies back from the music (depending on the music, anywhere between -3db and -12db). The goal is to carve out a space for the voice and music to co-exist.

In fact, when it comes to less is more, a supplement to that is take away before you add. This is particularly true when it comes to mixing. You’ll get far better results turning the loud things down than turning the quiet things up. And, your listener will appreciate your efforts much more (even if they don’t know it).

EVEN-ING THE ODD LEVELS: It’s not uncommon to have variances in the volume between recorded voices. There are a lot of tricks to getting the levels evened out, the most common one is to use a compressor. Compressors work kind of like a vice on a workbench (and many people use it that way), pressing everything together to hold it in one spot. In the audio world, this means that every sound below a certain audible level is amplified to that minimum, and every sound above a certain audible level is decreased to that maximum. The mistake people make is to trust the compressor to do its job without listening to the result. Common results are audio that has no dynamics (everything from a whisper to an explosion ends up being the same volume) and that there is an audible event of amplifying weak signals and crushing strong ones (think of how your ears feel after coming out of a loud concert). Telltale signs of improper use of a compressor is that ambient sounds like appliances, electronics and air movement end up taking residence in the mix. This is bad. Very bad! Where possible, do as much level tweaking using your level faders. Use compression only to bring things a little closer to each other. Moderate discrepancies in the levels are far better than overuse of compression.

ADDING SOME ENERGY: This is more of a technique used in recording music, though there are applications for corporate voiceover work, as well. I’m talking about using reverbs and, to a lesser extent, delays to add depth and energy to a voice. This is not something I generally recommend, by the way. However, if you must try it, I stand by the mantra of ‘less is more’. In fact, done well, most people won’t even notice the reverb at all. I remember when Mark Blacher introduced me to this approach of reverb use, I was irate that I was paying him to add reverb to the mix and I couldn’t hear it. Then, he muted the reverb and the song suddenly sounded empty and thin. Delays add an echo which, for obvious reasons, will be indentifiable in the mix. The real trick is to make sure the delay doesn’t become overly dominant.

NOISE FILTERS AND GATES: My best advice… get good foreground sound as far away as undesirable noises (such as refrigerators, fans, hums, etc…). Noise filters and gates introduce a lot of challenges and can really mess up a recording. The same goes for auto-ducking. Stay away! If you really must use these effects, see ingredient #3.

3) PLAY

The only way to know how to use the various dials, switches, faders, pans, pots, cables, blinky lights and especially your ears is to play with your equipment and as many different recordings as you can. Take advantage of quiet time and hobby projects to figure out how things work, how to make some things sound like hell and how to make others sound great.

There’s a million different ways to make good chilli and your job as the audio engineer and producer is to figure out which ingredients go best together, in which quantities and sequence, and how the result should sit in the bowl (and which bowl to use, for that matter). Then, figure out how to do things entirely differently.

With play comes fun and real experience.

THE NOT-SO-SECRET INGREDIENT

During our phone conversation, it became apparent that my client had ended up with processor creep (including a loudness maximizer). In an attempt to develop a sound they liked, they had moved so far away from the great source recording that there was a real disconnect between the original performance and the resulting audio.

When asked which processors I was using and how I was using them to get the great sound, I double checked and confirmed I was using only a little bit of subtractive equalization and nothing else; no compressors, no reverbs, no maximizers. The warm and full sound of the final product I produced came almost entirely from the skill and technique of the recording engineer (and the great equipment he’s using).

If I had to identify the one ingredient in audio secret sauce that makes a great product, it’s this… use your ears. Listen. Really. Carefully. Listen to the individual elements and (more importantly) how they all fit together. Everything you hear must make sense to your ears.

2009.05.30

Who needs a narrator anyway?

After being immersed in audio (and now video) production for the last four years, I’ve discovered that the greatest fun and flexibility in creative editing and storytelling is in playing with narration.  I’ve produced pieces in which the narrator played a key role in setting the context and guiding the listener/viewer through the story and others in which the narration has been implied.  I’ve also learned that there is a subtle and distinct difference between sound as a backdrop, sound as a character and sound as a narrator.

That’s why I grabbed a front row seat for Oh, Shut Up! Who needs a narrator anyway?, a session by Chris Brookes‘ at the Radio Without Boundaries conference.  Chris was connected by Skype from his home in Newfoundland (a family emergency kept him at home) and with the help of Paolo Pietropaolo at the conference, played clips of radio news coverage dating as far back as 1937 (the Hindenburg disaster) and 1939 (the King and Queen leaving by boat from Newfoundland), through to some very recent documentary programs which used a combination of sound and sparse narration.  We explored the role of narration in each clip, paying particular attention to how the narration makes the audience either a spectator or participant and how much authority the narrator assumes.  We also discussed some cases where the narration was gratuitous.

Like the Jens Jarisch session The Inner Sound of the Outer World at Third Coast, Chris’ session will have me exploring new possibilities in my production work.  Either that or I’ll be self-consciously stuck where I am.

2009.05.20

Reflecting on a major documentary project

I’m a firm believer in the principle of learning something new everyday (in fact, it’s the first statement in my personal manifesto).  Gaining new knowledge means exposing yourself to new opportunities and experiences. Whether it’s a new approach to something you’ve done before or a whole new activity, I recommend building on your foundation and trying something new everyday.  That’s how I tackled Rock Stars of Reading; a complex video and audio documentary project I’ve worked on for the last six months.

Before I share some of the lessons I learned, here are some statistics that help illustrate the scope of the project:

  • source video recordings:  13hrs
  • source audio recordings:  25hrs (includes sync-audio)
  • source photographs:  1200
  • editing time per video episode:  330 hours (averages to just under 16 hrs/episode)
  • produced video programs: 2 hrs and 56 mins (13 episodes)
  • produced audio programs: 2 hrs and 18 mins (8 episodes)
  • total production: 5 hrs and 14 mins (21 episodes)
  • the project is completely self-funded (no advertisers, sponsors or grants)

CAMERA WORK AND VISUAL EVIDENCE

There’s a lot to be said about spontaneity and capturing the moment.  Rock Stars of Reading depended on the recording equipment being the eyes and ears of the event.  Having said that, it would have been helpful to plan some of the camera work to ensure steady shots and good visual evidence.  In fact, the biggest hole in the documentary series was the abundance of b-roll at the expense of sufficient and effective visual evidence.  I didn’t know the distinction when we set out on the trip; I’m painfully aware of it, now.

I should note that we only bought our “spur-of-the-moment” video camera 12 hours before we set out for principle photography so starting with some basics like shopping around to pick out and buy the best camera for the job would have been a good start.

SUPPORT CREATIVITY WITH HEALTHY HABITS

Rock Stars of Reading was a hobby project so most of the editing and production work was done between the hours of 9pm and 3am.  That means I limited myself to three hours of sleep quite a bit and once pulled that 9-3 shift six days in a row.  I have nothing against being hard core about work you get paid for and hobbies you don’t, and I know about the power of working on creative projects when the world around you is still.  However, it’s important to eat well and get plenty of sleep, particularly if you’re engaged in demanding creative projects.

CONNECT WITH THE PEOPLE AND MATERIAL

Because I spent so much time (virtually) with them during the editing and production phases of the project, I became tightly connected with the people featured in the documentary series.  I became intimately familiar with their ideas, manners and words.  This offers a significant advantage since I was able to ensure that the messages they delivered were properly communicated in both video and audio (remember, they delivered them in person and the messages are received differently through a viewfinder than when two people are in the same physical space).

The disadvantage to this type of connection is you can feel artificially close to the characters and after 330 hours hanging out with them, you feel an absence when you realize you won’t be up with them from 9pm-3am tonight.

REVEAL THE STORY

At PodCamp Toronto I delivered a presentation called Content Paleontology: One approach to media production workflow and creative process.  The concept is that I don’t decide what the story is nor do I draft it, write it or tell it.  I go to where I believe the pieces of the story are and uncover them, record them and organize them in the way they reveal the story to me.  It’s an amazingly invigorating and exciting process that I as an editor/producer participate in — I don’t lead it.  Being a good editor means being able to identify the pieces that tell the story through their presence or absence from the final production.

KNOW WHO THE STAR IS

The star of the video is the combination of people, content and context that form the subject of the documentary.  As cinematographer, sound recordist, director, editor and producer, you are merely the vessel through which those stars shine.  Be minimalist in your appearance on the screen and how much of your voice appears in the final product, even if the documentary is meant to be fun and interactive.

By way of example, Michael Moore often places himself at the centre his controversial films which makes him as much of the story as the targets of his films.  That might have worked well in his personal essay Roger and Me, but the line blurs when it comes to his more critical films which Barry Hampe refers to as Docuganda.  Conversely, the only time you see or hear from Ken Burns in his brilliant and epic documentary films including Baseball, Jazz and The War is in the opening and closing credits.  His award-winning films are respected because they’re reflective, powerful and they let the people, places and events that shaped the world tell the stories themselves with minimal narrative.

In the case of Rock Stars of Reading, I reserved my appearance as the main character for the first and last episodes of the series which served to set up and conclude the purpose of the documentary and considered what changes our experiences have had and will have on us.

And those are five of the many lessons I will take with me to my next project.

© 2005 - 2010 Mark Blevis. Design by SnowyDay