2010.02.05

Sticky pieces for blog audiences (an experiment)

The findings of Pew Internet’s Social Media and Young Adults report earlier this week makes the case for inverted pyramid and sticky pieces writing by bloggers who wish to establish and retain relevance in a culture that wants more information in smaller doses.

THE REPORT

Pew’s report shows that teens are more interested in the snack-sized bits of information associated with text messaging and status messages in social media networks like Facebook. Despite fitting this description, Twitter is surprisingly unpopular among teens.

Blogs have lost favour likely because of the relatively high word count and the amount of information contained within most blog posts. That means teens are also less likely to start or maintain their own blog.

INVERTED PYRAMID

The inverted pyramid is a style of writing developed by newspapers to ensure readers get the most relevant information first followed by supplemental information of decreasing importance.

For pure news articles, the lead –the first paragraph– is the most important element. It should tell most of the story in the fewest words possible (typically 30-40 words). Front loading the article with the most relevant information means that editors are able to cut out paragraphs from the bottom up, based on available print space, without having to rewrite the piece. Basically, the author should make sure to put the relative fluff last.

STICKY PIECES

Whether they’ve written a longer piece about a complex idea and have broken it up into manageable sections, or they’re connecting a series of smaller ideas into something bigger, many bloggers have been breaking up posts into logical sections with heading titles for quite some time. Rather than overwhelming readers with the sea of words, they write a larger piece that’s broken up into sticky pieces, each of which could be something bigger on their own.

THE EXPERIMENT

Okay… This post is an experiment. I wondered if the reason blogs aren’t as popular anymore is because authors don’t communicate their ideas effectively which artificially drives up audience-scaring word count.

I decided to take an a-la-carte-consumption view to writing this post. I also decided to remove all personality to over-illustrate how being concise ensures delivery of important information that can’t fit the mold of a snack-sized-information-culture.

The question becomes, how much of this post do you remember?

2010.01.12

News junkies or techies: who carries more influence?

Whitney Hoffman has a great post in which she suggests the battle of the search engines will lead to walled gardens of information (see Searching Walled Gardens…). Her post is in response to Microsoft’s plan to pay Rupert Murdoch for exclusive search access to news sites such as the Wall Street Journal.

I see there being two camps of potential users of Bing!

THE NEWS JUKIES: Some folks will have no choice and will have to use Bing! to get the news they depend on from the source they’ve come to trust. Some might argue the Bing!/WSJ arrangement will be like information extortion by forcing a behavioural change on those who have specifically decided to stick with what they know and those who have no clue what Bing! is.

THE TECH JUNKIES: The technology-purists won’t be told what to do and how to do it. Many would rather forgo the content they love in order to send a message. The fundamentalists among this group will figure out a way to bypass the search restrictions and help the gatekeepers recognize their miscalculation (in case they haven’t yet heard of DRM).

There’s a delicate balance here and it pivots on how Bing!/WSJ will measure their success. I don’t believe it will be based on web clicks and search engine traffic alone. There’s money behind this deal and success will surely be measured by how much money Bing!/WSJ and their advertisers are able to make.

The question becomes, which group has the most influence in that department?

2008.01.31

Please participate in a five question survey

I am doing some research on where people go to find information.  Please take one minute to participate in an anonymous, multiple choice, five-question survey.

It will help make your day complete.

© 2005 - 2010 Mark Blevis. Design by SnowyDay