2010.01.24

For the critics, something’s gone horribly wrong

The NoProrogue monitoring dashboard

It was a slow start… crowds were small, there was an attempt to lead a series of long and complicated chants, one of the speakers yelled at rather than spoke to crowd and a Nortel employee opened her speech with “I’m a Nortel employee so I know something about the Internet.” From my desk at home (where I was also working on an RFP), I wasn’t convinced that Ottawa’s contribution to the cross-Canada rallies against proroguing Parliament was going to help make the Facebook group-initiated day of protest remarkable.

Ottawa, indeed Canada, is just too stiff when it comes to rallies. It’s tough getting people out for any side of any cause and in the rallying mood once they’re there (especially when most of the city was enjoying the first great day of skating on the Canal). You need something to stir the crowd up. In the case of yesterday’s rally in Ottawa, there were too many inexperienced opening acts.

Then Trevor Strong of The Arrogant Worms took the stage. ”If I’m at a rally, something’s gone horribly wrong,” he said. Suddenly the gathering of an estimated 4,000 people (RCMP figures) became a rally that chanted Trevor into an encore after his song The Proroguer. Name a rally in Ottawa that encored one of its presenters.

THE BEGINNING OF THE CURVE

However, the real story isn’t the two-hour rally with student speakers, celebrity singers and party leaders. The story is that a national day of protest organized on Facebook managed to get in excess of 27,000 people rallying in cities across the country and even in major cities in the U.S. and U.K. All of the politicians and critics that thought an online gathering was cute now find themselves having to acknowledge that digital advocacy and engagement is on track to help shape our country’s government — with or without their participation.

And that’s not all. Digital tools played a significant communication role during the event. Protesters used the #noprorogue tag in Twitter, incorporated live blogging technology (which also aggregated all tagged Twitter posts), uploaded photos to Flickr and videos to YouTube, and video of the Ottawa event was live streamed to the Internet. Canadians are making this an important issue and the media has had to be a part of that or be left behind by democratized media. That certainly made it easy for observers like me.

MISSING VOICE

One aspect of the prorogued Parliament that isn’t getting much attention is the pro-proroguing opinion. Maybe one hundred prorogue supporters have been working the comments section of CBC.ca reports on the rallies, dismissing the participation rates at the rallies as being pathetic and representing less than one have of one per cent of Canada’s population.

If the measure of the popular opinion is numbers in Facebook groups and real world rallies, there is apparently no support for proroguing Parliament. [Note: a group calling itself Canadians Against 'Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament' has appeared on Facebook today. It has 47 members at the time of this post.]

IT TAKES ONE PERSON TO START SOMETHING

That’s the thing about Canada: drumming up participation and coordinated efforts for any side of any issue is incredibly difficult. Canadians, whether content or angry, just aren’t bred to rock the boat. Which makes Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament an incredible success. The Facebook group managed to convert roughly 13% of the digital participation in to a coordinated real world rally that spanned the country and the world — all because of one person, Christopher White, a student in Calgary.

Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament can now take comfort in the fact that their detractors made significant miscalculations and have a busy week ahead of them.

2010.01.22

Michael Ignatieff puts digital in political engagement

Canadian politics became a little more digital when Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff and his staff hosted an online town hall meeting yesterday afternoon.

Mr. Ignatieff responded to 31 questions and comments during the one hour session. Not bad when you consider the amount of time it takes to receive, read, select, publish and respond to each.

I was surprised and pleased to see that the questions dealt with a wide range of issues including voting systems, poll results, legalization of marijuana, the role of youth in Canadian politics, the Alberta tar sands and (of course) prorogation. Mr. Ignatieff even gave props to the government for its handling of the Haitian earthquake.

I expected the town hall would have revolved around the Facebook group Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament (CAPP) and the rallies that group has been instrumental in organizing for this Saturday — particularly since the hour started with two questions on the subject. The fact that it didn’t either speaks to the broad spectrum of questions asked by Canadians or the careful moderation of the town hall by Mr. Ignatieff’s staff.

By the way, CAPP has 209,403 members as of the writing of this post.

It would be interesting to find out how many people registered for and actually attended the town hall, how many questions were submitted and on what topics, and which questions Mr. Ignatieff and his staff avoided — aside from the one question they accepted didn’t really answer (see the question time stamped 3:47).

An online town hall may not seem like much. I believe this represents a significant step forward by a politician to reach Canadians where they’re already gathering. Digital also represents opportunities for politicians to demonstrate fiscal responsibility by staying connected while saving travel and event costs — and maintaing some sanity in the politicians’ lives. It’s also something that can come together in pretty short order.

Coupled with his recent tour of universities, yesterday’s digital event shows that Mr. Ignatieff is committed to get young voters involved and out to the polls in greater numbers. He’ll likley pick up a few online political nomads along the way.

You can read the transcript of Mr. Ignatieff’s town hall on the Liberal Party’s website.

Photo from the online transcript.

2009.12.23

Libel protections will fast-track media reporting

In follow-up to my post, yesterday, about the Supreme Court of Canada “responsible communication” ruling that establishes libel protections for journalists and bloggers, I’d like to add that this will likely reduce time-to-publish for media organizations that have typically relied on clearance from their legal departments before going public with public interest and investigative reports.

Michael Geist has published more details about the defence on his blog and included his thoughts about this decision being a significant victory for freedom of expression. In his post he includes the following from the ruling:

…the traditional media are rapidly being complemented by new ways of communicating on matters of public interest, many of them online, which do not involve journalists. These new disseminators of news and information should, absent good reasons for exclusion, be subject to the same laws as established media outlets.

© 2005 - 2010 Mark Blevis. Design by SnowyDay